Intel’s Processor Naming Conventions Explained

In some ways, the older days were better, the more the Megahertz, the better the processor, and of course, Intel ruled the roost, so there was no Intel-AMD battle to choose from. With the introduction of technologies such as 64 bit computing and dual core processors, AMD gradually made up ground, and Intel seemed to have reached the pinnacle. After the rude awakening, Intel took on new strategies, and changed the naming convention for their processors. No more are processor names as simple as “Pentium 4 - 2.4 GHz”, instead of which you’ll find “Intel Pentium D 7xx” (I can’t remember the exact number). So, let us analyse what Intel’s new numbers actually mean.

First things first, the “D” in newer Intel processors does not stand for dual-core, but instead for ‘desktop’. Now, let’s the the various series Intel has to offer:

Future Processors

NOTE :- To those of you who have been expecting a Pentium 5 for ages, all I have to say is that the chances of that ever happening are quite negligible, because Intel are trying to make their nomenclature more sensible (a little too much, maybe ? :think: ), and there’s no point in adding a number because the clock speeds increase (which isn’t likely either) !

POSTED BY Abhinav on 13 December 2005
in Dumb Machine

 

Please leave a Comment

If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below.

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Comments


 

 

© 2005-2008 diGit Blog [Disclaimer]. Content of this Blog Licensed Under Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported
Riding Stoutly on WordPress   ||   Powered by iNetwork.IN   ||   Hosted by 23Miles Technologies